Interesting criteria you have for resolving contradictions. It's flawed, by the way.
Posted By: Zeous
Date: Monday 11 February 2019, at 07:21 pm
If you care why I say that, here you go:
* Premise: you claim to know what someone believes (highly unlikely given your penchant for strawman arguments)
* Next: your belief that said other's belief is incorrect - this is okay, but is not a sound premise by itself
* Lastly, your argument is unsound: (even if true) that "the other's belief is incorrect, therefore ALL of his arguments are incorrect"... because fallacy of composition.
This is not a personal attack, this is a critique of your logic. 
