Why is it absurd to think a woman can terminate outside of extenuating circumstances ? Who defines thst? Who are you are or me to judge anybody's situation?. | Utefans.Net
Utefans.Net - Uniting the Fans Since 1998
Mobile - Home - Message Board - Best Stuff - Game Schedule - Photo Gallery - Quotable - Join!

Why is it absurd to think a woman can terminate outside of extenuating circumstances ? Who defines thst? Who are you are or me to judge anybody's situation?.

Posted By: FlyfishingUte
Date: Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 04:57 am

So if two people get drunk one night, lose their inhibitions have um protected sex and she ends up oregsnt she should have to have the baby???

Why does society have an interest in a woman choosing to abort her pregnancy? Society has shown it abandons these unwanted children more often than not, How and why is that any of my Or your business??? It isn't.

Again I'm not a fan of abortion but I don't believe that what a woman chooses to do with her pregnancy is any body else's business.

<<Ignore FlyfishingUte ] [PritnerPrint This Message ] >>

Messages In This Thread


UTE BC icon NEW: Matt Walsh on Twitter
UTE BC - -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 08:29 pm [ID# 1938138] [reply]
(2)
o NEW: The right to kill your own child is interesting. It’s not your DNA and genetic code. It’s not your organs. It’s not your brain or heart. My body, my right doesn’t seem appropriate argument and saying when it’s someone else’s body.
Hammer2 - -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 08:56 pm [ID# 1938139] [reply]
(1)
o NEW: and again, It's NONE of YOURS or my business what decisions a woman makes about abortion. AND in the remote event that some tax money MAY have paid for part of it it's still NONE of our business. I don't get why some people
FlyfishingUte - -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 09:12 pm [ID# 1938142] [reply]
(7)
jhill icon NEW: " in the remote event that some tax money MAY have paid for part of it it's still NONE of our business. "
jhill - Top 25 Poster -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 09:24 pm [ID# 1938144] [reply]
(5)
o NEW: yeah? still none yours or my business, tax money or no tax money. NONE of our business. IF you are opposed to abortion just say so. I'm no fan of abortion but I don't believe i have ANY business inserting my opinion on this in some woman's life (nm)
FlyfishingUte - -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 09:46 pm [ID# 1938151] [reply]
(3)
Zeous icon NEW: What if the baby is one second out of the womb and she kills it? Is it then your business? (nm)
Zeous - -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 11:22 pm [ID# 1938170] [reply]
The Thrill icon NEW: Typical response created to induce shock. FTR, that happens less frequently than school shootings (nm)
The Thrill - Top 25 Poster -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 07:20 am [ID# 1938181] [reply]
(2)
Zeous icon NEW: No, it is a philisophical question to determine what the underlying principle is. Would you like to state your underlying principle that makes one ok ane one not, assuming one is not on for you.
Zeous - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 09:32 am [ID# 1938228] [reply]
480ute icon NEW: If it's out of the womb it no longer poses a risk to the mother's health, so I'm not sure how this argument is relevant.
480ute - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 01:12 pm [ID# 1938280] [reply]
(1)
TheRealU icon NEW: There is a point when a life becomes society's business.
TheRealU - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 01:06 am [ID# 1938173] [reply]
(2)
o NEW: Why is it absurd to think a woman can terminate outside of extenuating circumstances ? Who defines thst? Who are you are or me to judge anybody's situation?.
FlyfishingUte - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 04:57 am [ID# 1938174] [reply]
(2)
o NEW: Is the unborn child protected by the constitution? The child is protected if someone murders the pregnant mom, now it's a double murder, having taken TWO, count them TWO lives. But that child is not protected if the mother kills the life.
Hammer2 - -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 09:27 pm [ID# 1938146] [reply]
o NEW: signed all the kids in foster care cuz there's so many conservatives lining up to open up their homes to the unwanted children. AND again what a woman does with her body
FlyfishingUte - -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 09:51 pm [ID# 1938153] [reply]
(2)
The Thrill icon NEW: It’s easy to point fingers from an ivory tower. It’s funny that everybody in this thread will most likely never have to face a decision like this. Yet, here we are debating the issue.
The Thrill - Top 25 Poster -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 07:26 am [ID# 1938183] [reply]
(1)
jhill icon NEW: I know the BB is satire but they nailed it.
jhill - Top 25 Poster -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 09:12 pm [ID# 1938143] [reply]
(1)
Newbomb Turk icon NEW: "because you don't want to nut up and raise him or her."
Newbomb Turk - Top 25 Poster -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 09:26 pm [ID# 1938145] [reply]
(1)
UTE BC icon NEW: The current wait time to adopt a healthy baby varies by state anywhere from 2 to 7 years.
UTE BC - -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 09:33 pm [ID# 1938147] [reply]
Newbomb Turk icon NEW: Okay. How about the unhealthy babies? (nm)
Newbomb Turk - Top 25 Poster -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 09:36 pm [ID# 1938148] [reply]
UTE BC icon NEW: 3 to 6 months. (nm)
UTE BC - -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 09:39 pm [ID# 1938149] [reply]
Newbomb Turk icon NEW: Now if we can just get all unwanted babies put up for adoption..... (nm)
Newbomb Turk - Top 25 Poster -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 09:47 pm [ID# 1938152] [reply]
(2)
jhill icon NEW: Umm if you tax the rich 70% and way even more according to some of your socialists heros then they won't be rich anymore and they are going to pull the plug on everything and innovation will die.
jhill - Top 25 Poster -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 09:52 pm [ID# 1938154] [reply]
o NEW: who typed that for you? no way in hell you typed that, you'd be laughing to hard to type that. (nm)
FlyfishingUte - -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 09:56 pm [ID# 1938155] [reply]
(1)
Newbomb Turk icon NEW: I wasn't talking about the income tax rate, I was talking about the inheritance tax.
Newbomb Turk - Top 25 Poster -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 10:01 pm [ID# 1938158] [reply]
(1)
Newbomb Turk icon NEW: Weird how the tax rates in the 50's were even higher, but it was a very prosperous time. I guess "socialism" can't ruin it every time. (nm)
Newbomb Turk - Top 25 Poster -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 10:07 pm [ID# 1938159] [reply]
(1)
The Thrill icon NEW: One difference. Those children don’t have mothers, they have people who hate them
The Thrill - Top 25 Poster -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 07:31 am [ID# 1938184] [reply]
The Thrill icon NEW: This is reality and probably won’t go over well here
The Thrill - Top 25 Poster -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 09:56 pm [ID# 1938156] [reply]
(5)
o NEW: you are exactly right but the pro life crusaders won't hear or believe what you are saying (nm)
FlyfishingUte - -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 09:59 pm [ID# 1938157] [reply]
(1)
jhill icon NEW: Ok.
jhill - Top 25 Poster -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 10:14 pm [ID# 1938160] [reply]
Newbomb Turk icon NEW: "How about we focus on people not getting pregnant and actually educate them instead of just killing their mistakes? "
Newbomb Turk - Top 25 Poster -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 10:21 pm [ID# 1938161] [reply]
(7)
The Thrill icon NEW: And sex education in schools. Ironic really.
The Thrill - Top 25 Poster -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 07:45 am [ID# 1938187] [reply]
o NEW: Abstinence only sex education does not work. Kids need knowledge to make informed decisions. Sadly conservatives don't seem to get that the more taboo you make
FlyfishingUte - -- Wednesday 30 January 2019, at 10:43 pm [ID# 1938166] [reply]
(1)
The Thrill icon NEW: You should know by now, people are terrible at being responsible
The Thrill - Top 25 Poster -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 07:01 am [ID# 1938177] [reply]
o NEW: Is Sarah Palin's pregnant daughter still the official spokeperson for abstinance? Is she still pregnant? (nm)
Ute Bear - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 07:38 am [ID# 1938186] [reply]
(3)
The Thrill icon NEW: You can’t tell me that Trump or some of his buddies never coerced a female into an abortion with hush money. (nm)
The Thrill - Top 25 Poster -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 07:48 am [ID# 1938189] [reply]
(2)
Red Don icon NEW: Not out of the question, it's proven it just doesn't work. (nm)
Red Don - Top 25 Poster -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 12:12 pm [ID# 1938258] [reply]
TheRealU icon NEW: I remember my wife and I going to our first ultrasound and seeing this weird little sea monkey.
TheRealU - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 12:56 am [ID# 1938172] [reply]
(1)
The Thrill icon NEW: I have three kids, love them all and could personally never do any harm to them.
The Thrill - Top 25 Poster -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 07:12 am [ID# 1938179] [reply]
(1)
480ute icon NEW: And he's full of $#!+. (long)
480ute - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 07:08 am [ID# 1938178] [reply]
(5)
The Thrill icon NEW: It appears states are being preemptive to a federal slashing of Roe v Wade
The Thrill - Top 25 Poster -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 07:16 am [ID# 1938180] [reply]
(1)
480ute icon NEW: I don't blame them. The GOP is preying on people in their base who are unwilling to research any claims.
480ute - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 07:21 am [ID# 1938182] [reply]
(1)
UTE BC icon NEW: Snopes is full of shot
UTE BC - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 07:52 am [ID# 1938190] [reply]
480ute icon NEW: Attack the medium rather than research the claims, just as predicted. I posted a snippet that happened to be on Snopes, but originated in a proposed law. These are FACTS that you refuse to address.
480ute - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 08:07 am [ID# 1938195] [reply]
(8)
UTE BC icon NEW: So you didn’t read the article.
UTE BC - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 08:12 am [ID# 1938197] [reply]
480ute icon NEW: Dude, address the FACTS. #%!@ arguing over the medium. It's irrelevant to the points that counter your entire narrative.
480ute - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 08:18 am [ID# 1938198] [reply]
(3)
UTE BC icon NEW: Here’s a suggestion- if you don’t want to talk about the medium DONT BRING IT UP!
UTE BC - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 08:22 am [ID# 1938199] [reply]
(1)
480ute icon NEW: I brought it up, as I said before, because I knew you would discount any FACTS laid out in it due to the medium. That's exactly what you #%!@ing did.
480ute - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 08:31 am [ID# 1938203] [reply]
(3)
Newbomb Turk icon NEW: This whole abortion discussion is another deflection. This will be added to the conservative toolbox along with "Dems are for crime and open borders". (nm)
Newbomb Turk - Top 25 Poster -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 08:36 am [ID# 1938207] [reply]
(1)
UTE BC icon NEW: You really ought to read your post sometimes. In your post you said that people don’t trust Snopes and then you complained that nobody ever tells you why.
UTE BC - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 08:38 am [ID# 1938210] [reply]
(1)
480ute icon NEW: It's not about winning, that's the problem. We're so worried about winning people over to our sides that truth often takes a backseat if it doesn't jive with the point we're pushing. (short)
480ute - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 09:21 am [ID# 1938225] [reply]
Newbomb Turk icon NEW: "Here’s a suggestion- if you don’t want to talk about the medium DONT BRING IT UP!" Perfect. Your medium was Daily Caller. What a reliable source! (nm)
Newbomb Turk - Top 25 Poster -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 08:34 am [ID# 1938204] [reply]
(2)
UTE BC icon NEW: I find it reliable (nm)
UTE BC - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 08:35 am [ID# 1938205] [reply]
Newbomb Turk icon NEW: Of course you do. (musses Ute BC's hair). (nm)
Newbomb Turk - Top 25 Poster -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 08:37 am [ID# 1938208] [reply]
(5)
o NEW: Question for you BC Ute. Do you believe that women should have the right to a late term abortion if her life is in danger?
Ute Bear - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 07:36 am [ID# 1938185] [reply]
(1)
UTE BC icon NEW: I disagree on your interpretation of the article.
UTE BC - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 07:59 am [ID# 1938191] [reply]
o NEW: Thank you for your honest anwers. It would appear then that you and NY legislature both agree that there are limited circumstances in which late term abortion should be permitted.
Ute Bear - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 08:38 am [ID# 1938209] [reply]
(1)
UTE BC icon NEW: I don’t believe the NY legislative branch and myself will have the same standards. I don’t think I called anyone a name did I? (nm)
UTE BC - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 08:41 am [ID# 1938211] [reply]
Newbomb Turk icon NEW: The guy that you quoted in the OP called the left "bloodthirsty lunatics". So, technically, you didn't call anyone names. (nm)
Newbomb Turk - Top 25 Poster -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 08:45 am [ID# 1938213] [reply]
480ute icon NEW: Legislators leave it to doctors and patients to decide, just like in every other state. (short)
480ute - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 09:34 am [ID# 1938229] [reply]
UTE BC icon NEW: You also know that their are amoral politicians and physicians (short)
UTE BC - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 10:42 am [ID# 1938243] [reply]
480ute icon NEW: So best to just ban the practice altogether, consequences to women be damned?
480ute - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 01:10 pm [ID# 1938279] [reply]
(1)
mokus icon NEW: This is all aside the point that this is generalization and fear mongering.
mokus - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 08:44 am [ID# 1938212] [reply]
(1)
GUBA icon NEW: Family friends of mine had to decide how to deal with 2 separate babies who had severe deformities in the womb such that they would not survive outside. The first one had a poorly formed skull such that the brain was growing outside and thus would
GUBA - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 08:49 am [ID# 1938214] [reply]
(2)
The Thrill icon NEW: I can't imagine giving birth to a deformed and terminal baby only to watch it die weeks or months later can be easier than a late term abortion. (nm)
The Thrill - Top 25 Poster -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 10:36 am [ID# 1938240] [reply]
GUBA icon NEW: If they even survived birth it might only be hours. Certainly no chance for any prolonged life at all. It was an awful experience all around. (nm)
GUBA - -- Thursday 31 January 2019, at 11:02 am [ID# 1938248] [reply]
<< Previous Home Next >>
Prev Index Next
Log in!
Username or email
Password
Remember me

Forgot your password?

> Become a Member...

Business Directory
-->

DISCLAIMER: UteFans.Net is not affiliated with the University of Utah, except that the owner, operators and contributing members are students, alumni, and rabid fans of the U. Additionally, the owner and operators of Utefans.Net are not responsible for the actions of those who use this public forum. By contributing to this forum you agree to abide by the Rules of Conduct outlined on the Post Message page.

Forum - Boardmail - Profile - Schedule - Events - Photos - Archive - Quotable - Join!
Home | About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | News | Contact Us

Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Utefans LC. All rights reserved. Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.